Michael C. Hall Leaving Kings Road Cafe In L.A. [Photos]

byJohn •

Dexter star Michael C. Hall was spotted on June 26, leaving Kings Road Cafe in Los Angeles. See more photos by clicking here.

Tags

Post a Comment

  1. NeedlestickinghedonistJune 29, 2012 at 7:51 AM

    hahah kissing time. the girl is wearing the kind of boots i like to wear. cute.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 8:11 AM

    I'm so happy for him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 8:18 AM

    It looks like they are putting on a show. They knew they would be photographed at King’s; where he has been photographed many times before. Maybe he will make an announcement soon? :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 8:59 AM

    He needs to be with Jen again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 9:31 AM

      No.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 9:51 AM

      No. The very fact that Jennifer is okay with continuing with "Dexter" makes me think she did the leaving. She's always come across as highly emotional in her TV interviews, and I cannot imagine her being okay with it if Michael had been the wrong-doer.
      His surprising response to questions on a New Zealand radio show video kinda gave away the fact that it's been tough for him. He was stilted and very introspective. His post-separation comment that dating is hard in Hollywood because everyone's so in love with themselves was pretty revealing. This girl doesn't seem Hollywoodish. I hope he finds true happiness.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 12:39 PM

      Anon 9:51, that's is quite the leap in assumptions and the statement "She's always come across as highly emotional in her TV interviews, and I cannot imagine her being okay with it if Michael had been the wrong-doer." does not compute, let alone make sense.

      As for his statements on a New Zealand radio show - everyone feels the pain of a divorce, even the "wrong-doer".

      I hope he is finally happy and I hope this girl goes into any relationship with him with her eyes wide open.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 3:56 AM

      Yes, mine is pure speculation gleaned from comments made in interviews. and sorry, but it makes sense if one goes by basic human psychology...and the kind of personality Jennifer C. displays in her interviews. Watch the videos. The girl wears her heart on her sleeve all the time. It's hard to believe she would be this cool about a cheating hisband.
      And Michael's interview - well, it doesn't come through in my third-hand version of his words. God knows, the Kiwi media seemed to have no hesitation in asking him what it was like working with an ex-wife during the Season 6 shoot. Most awkward.

      Delete
    5. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 3:57 AM

      *husband*

      Delete
    6. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 10:20 AM

      Speculate away 3:56, that's why we are all here posting shit.

      My speculation is that Jennifer was in a difficult situation, not only is your marriage dissolved but your job and many of your friends are centered around your ex husband.

      She chose to take the high road in public interviews. Who would talk negatively about their boss in interviews - Jennifer is too smart to discuss the real reason why their marriage ended.

      They are all professional actors with a team of managers/PR advisors, so they know how to portray their desired image to the media and paparazzi - including Michael. He's a genius at pretending.

      Delete
  5. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 9:55 AM

    Aww that last kiss on her shoulder. He kisses Harrison that way, lol

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 9:56 AM

    There's lots of pics on the net. He was pulling her back from the traffic in front of them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. BreeB714June 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM

    He looks so happy! And chubby in the belly, adorable! I hope they are very happy... But i want to know who this lady is.. She looks very young... And every photo of her looks like she is wearing his clothes...? Also i do not get why he goes to Kings Road Cafe, it is such a scene... And the food is not THAT great... But the coffee is amazing.. so i guess.. And its 3 minutes from his house..

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 1:09 PM

    This looks so staged. And desperate.

    So public. I mean, get a grip!

    She looks ridiculously young and immature (save the intimate stuff for the bedroom, love), ghastly pale, sickly thin and her hair looks flat and lank. He just looks like an idiot and equally immature.

    And they both need some style tips.

    But apart from that, I hope it works out for them. Maybe they are well suited.

    However, there are many 'lovey dovey' pictures of him with his first two wives. Remember? What evidence is there that this will turn out any different? Eyes wide shut. And all.

    Oh and by the way, just my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 1:18 PM

      agree on every point!

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 4:00 PM

      It does looked staged. Especially the kiss and hug. They can tell the photographers are RIGHT there. It's almost like she's staking her territory for everyone to see. "He's mine!" and she proves it by holding his face and kissing him. Ha. I wish them well, she will need it with all the attention that will be thrown at her. Maybe the Dexter sites should consider not publishing these photos in the future until something offical is announced????

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 4:07 AM

      Wow, it hurts that much, does it? What a ghastly attack on another individual. It's not them being unnatural, it's the paparazzi. She seems real.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 4:47 AM

      Style tips for your benefit? I don't think so. I think her style is dope.

      Delete
    5. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM

      "dope"!! That's EXACTLY what she looks like; dope, drugged out, hippie-wannabe-15-year-old on a meth bender. Great observation 4:47!!!

      Delete
    6. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 2:33 PM

      What a sad, jaundiced view you have of life around you.

      Delete
    7. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 8:38 AM

      Staged?? Not at all. If it was staged he would swoop over her like Tom Cruise used to with Katie. This is kinda sloppy and real. Touching really. Glad he has found someone. What's the point in having all this fame and wealth if you are alone.

      Delete
    8. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 9:27 AM

      In my part of the world, the word 'dope' means stupid or idiotic.

      I am assuming that the meaning used here is different?

      Although, must admit, I'm not sure that my understanding of the word is completely out of kilter here...

      Delete
    9. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 11:17 AM

      Staged?

      Maybe not.

      They went to King's where Michael has been photographed many times by paparazzi and they were definitely showing their affection for each other KNOWING the cameras were taking their photographs.

      Michael has always been very protective of his private life until now, so maybe they are using the paparazzi to show he is happy with this girl?

      Delete
  9. Maria BlissJune 29, 2012 at 3:36 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Maria BlissJune 29, 2012 at 3:40 PM

    The first thing that comes to mind is...what the crap is she wearing and is he blind? secondly why do we need to see pictures like this? I like him for his acting, all this being obsessed with every move he makes is creepy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM

      A little jealous of her maybe?

      And who forced you to see the pictures?

      Delete
    2. Maria BlissJune 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM

      why would I be jealous? I'm happily married thanks. I automatically clicked the link as it came up, like I always do

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 4:03 AM

      Wow, that is such bull. We're all intelligent people with guilty pleasures. We're just a little more forthright about it, that's all.

      Delete
    4. NeedlestickinghedonistJune 30, 2012 at 4:12 AM

      agree.

      Delete
    5. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 9:29 AM

      Jealousy only comes in if you think he (or she) is a good catch.

      Delete
  11. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM

    Don't know what this has to do with Dexter.

    Bizarre photo that means nothing that comes with dozens of ridiculously stupid and "reading into nothing" statements by random people that make me totally believe an asteroid needs to slap into the earth and reset the entire species.

    I'm grumpy this morning, see "there is this situation with a woman..." yea, I got real life drama that makes me not give a shit what is going on with random actors lives. Perhaps y'all should get some of that too! It will fuck you up, but it will get your head back into your own life where it belongs.

    Just sayin'...

    Z

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maria BlissJune 29, 2012 at 3:55 PM

      I so love your reply!

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 3:58 AM

      Then why are you here? The heading makes it obvious that this article will have nothing to do with "Dexter". I call this hypocrisy trying to be cool.

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 2:21 PM

      A: Hypocrisy would be me commenting/taking a shot on the actor's personal lives, which I have not done. There is nothing hypocritical about goosing people who are saying inappropriate and cruel things about the actors/families they are supposedly "fans" of - understand? It's the maliciousness that makes my stomach turn, the hostility that I detest - kinda like the nasty shot you just gave me!

      B: If I was trying to be cool, I would not be posting on a random internet fan-board like the Dexter geek that I am, so again, a baseless accusation made out of misplaced anger or jealousy.

      I stand by everything I said. There is nothing wrong with posting on this thread and saying nice things. It's the rotten things and the really stupid speculation - the "TMZ Mentality" that I don't understand and that disgusts me on levels I can't even describe. It turns my stomach. The fucking foul mean streak that has become prevalent in our society, where we think it's our right to say cruel personal things about any random person is a disease that is out of hand. I was raised in an era where politeness was demanded and expected. It's a societal virtue that I dearly miss.

      Z

      Delete
    4. NeedlestickinghedonistJune 30, 2012 at 2:33 PM

      that's exactly what i was thinking reading some of the comments with moronic speculations as to why michael is divorced or what he should be doing to be happy(are these posts serious)or about the girl's looks or the way she dresses. people are sickening.

      Delete
  12. BreeB714June 29, 2012 at 6:31 PM

    Why is it wrong to wonder and want to see pictures of our favorite actor? I see nothing wrong with this.. Aren't we alloweed to gossip and speculate a little

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 6:59 PM

      I didn't say it was wrong, just like I would NEVER say that this:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJQVlVHsFF8

      is "wrong"

      I'll let you fill in the rest of the blanks...


      Z

      Delete
    2. PatrikJune 29, 2012 at 7:09 PM

      That. Is wrong..

      Delete
    3. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 7:31 PM

      Dear Z,

      Is this why you are having woman issues? Some advise - turn off the Hoff. I know it's HARD. But you will feel better when you blow him off.

      Sincerely with Warmest Regards,
      The World

      Delete
    4. AnonymousJune 29, 2012 at 8:11 PM

      7:31

      I try, really, but it's like leaving the room when you are a teenager and your friends are watching the original "I Spit On Your Grave" - you know it's wrong and that you shouldn't even glance, but since it's there... why not traumatize yourself for the rest of your life?

      Z

      Delete
  13. BreeB714June 29, 2012 at 7:26 PM

    i totally love The Hoff.. That song rocks.. The graphics and green screen are terrible, so i am going home to drink and erase those images

    ReplyDelete
  14. NeedlestickinghedonistJune 29, 2012 at 7:27 PM

    that video is genius. but anyway, these posts are indeed irrelevant, there are websites for this.

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 4:50 AM

    She just looks head over heels in love poor kid. Who can blame her lol!

    ReplyDelete
  16. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 7:56 AM

    She looks nice in other photoshoots. She's pretty in a Jewel... Tori Amos kind of way.
    http://michaelchallweb.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=88&pid=898#top_display_media

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 2:34 PM

      She looks much better in your link. Prettier and more normal lol

      Delete
  17. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 5:24 PM

    She's not a kid. She's 30 years old.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJune 30, 2012 at 8:32 PM

      how do you know

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 4:03 AM

      Her behavior (and dress sense) resembles that of a teenager. And so does his. Behavior, that is.

      If you are 30 and choosing to see someone who is relatively well known and continues to work within the public domain (and who is 11 years your senior), you could act far more discreet and grown up about it. Especially outside a place where there are bound to be cameras. They both look and are acting like teenagers. He should definitely know better at his age. Nothing wrong with being young at heart. Just know how to conduct yourselves in a more mature way publicly. Dont moan about loss of privacy and then laud it about for all and sundry to see. This is meant to be helpful.

      Delete
    3. NeedlestickinghedonistJuly 1, 2012 at 4:15 AM

      i don't see him moaning. they don't give a f*** i think. it looks that way. plus, there's nothing wrong with the way she dresses. there is no "adult" way of dressing up. then again i never gave much thought to other people's clothing items and im not in a position to judge objectively since im wearing the same boots the girl has on.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 6:48 AM

      5:24 does not know how old she is

      Delete
    5. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 8:44 AM

      She could well be 30 in that black outfit outside the movie theater. She isn't always dressed like this. I agree with Needlestickinghedonist, this is what so many people are wearing, specially people in film & TV production. She's looks very art department to me. People in film, TV, the arts don't have to be even half-way formal in their dress code as others do.

      Delete
    6. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 8:58 AM

      Anon 4:03 needs to lighten up bigtime. There are thousands of pics of mature stars - even the late great Paul Newman had no problem openly canoodling with his wife. Poor Michael C.Hall, he's never moaned about his fame, nor has he ever sought notoriety in Hollywood. He is one of those rare guys who is respected by fans, media and colleagues alike. The last guy to merit this kind of spiteful shit. Anon 4:03 really shouldn't try and be helpful to anyone. They'll end up being joyless zombies like her.

      Delete
    7. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 9:35 AM

      Most actors are children. They play 'make believe' all day.

      You're assuming that the poster is female. Nothing wrong with that. We all make assumptions... It's human nature.

      Delete
    8. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 12:10 PM

      As is your post full of assumptions if you think actors are children and "make believe" all day. Yep, I'm not just assuming, I'm consolidating the vaguely bitchy, nitpicking comments that seem like they're coming from the same person. Those comments include carping about what Hall & gal pal are wearing. I've yet to meet a guy who gives this much of a shit about what anyone wears. And sure, if the posts don't belong to a pinched joyless female, then a pinched, judgemental joyless man is fine by me too.

      Delete
    9. NeedlestickinghedonistJuly 1, 2012 at 12:36 PM

      spot on, mate.

      Delete
    10. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 3:00 PM

      So 12.10 you agree with me that everyone makes assumptions. Including you.

      Observing the comments is interesting. Some are critical of the pictures. Some are critical of the critical comments. Some are critical of the critical comments of the critical comments. How ironic. I suppose it is ok to be critical provided it's aimed at some nobody on the Internet but not when it's aimed at some one in the public eye, especially one who is adored. By being critical of my comments you are being critical and 'nitpicky' yourself. You know what? I'm ok with that. I feel the need to be neither right nor justified. And Im happy also to be ignored. I am what I am, some flawed human being just like everyone else. Unless, of course, you are perfect. In which case, congratulations.

      Im not suggesting you are 'worked up' over a nobody's opinion. But if you are, dont waste your energy. My comments are just a drop in the ocean in the history of time. Insignificant. As are yours.

      Nonetheless, I'm still entitled to that opinion.

      That is all. I'm happy for you to have the last say.

      Delete
    11. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 3:45 PM

      touche - well said

      Delete
    12. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 4:11 PM

      Oh yes, Anon 3:00, I don't deny speculating or making an assumption. But at least I make it off a certain impression I get from the posts, whereas the bitchy poster makes assumptions about Michael C. Hall without a grain of evidence. And if wearing grungy casuals or showing one's affection in public is basis for assuming the man is an exhibitionist, show off, immature, trying to recapture his teenage years, a potential cheating husband, a liar/pretender, then I would think my assumptions pale next to the ones made by Sour Grapes.

      Delete
    13. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 4:20 PM

      ehhh - not as well said

      Delete
    14. AnonymousJuly 2, 2012 at 10:40 AM

      You praise your own posts, nice.

      Delete
    15. AnonymousJuly 2, 2012 at 5:01 PM

      wrong. just admired how meticulously 3:00 exposed your hipocritcal post.

      Delete
  18. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 4:05 AM

    "Babes in the woods."

    ReplyDelete
  19. AnonymousJuly 1, 2012 at 4:31 AM

    Or 'Idol and Fan'. Maybe both...

    ReplyDelete
  20. AnonymousJuly 4, 2012 at 10:49 PM

    Wasn't her hair a pale blonde in the earlier photos when she's first seen with MCH? Now it's a lot darker. Just wonderin'.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post
Share to other apps
Copy Post Link

Contact Form